Response

Robin Yess's website has a post which includes a copy of an article written by one of her hangers on in defense of her silliness. Mocking Robin is mentioned in the article. One of the things the author writes is that he contacted Mocking Robin through our comments section to ask for an interview.

This is true. He did make contact with us. After a long discussion, we took a vote about whether to respond. The vote was almost unanimous. Only one of us wanted to answer his questions.

The reason we decided to ignore his request is simple. He is not unbiased. He was obviously writing a fluff piece to defend the reprehensible attack blog run by Robin Yess and her ridiculous little band of crotchety complainers.

The person who wrote the piece has a blog which is full of weird things. In April, he posted a vide which claimed to prove that JFK was shot by his own driver. He said that an anti-terrorist exercise by the Kingston PD was an experiment in martial law. In a post he called "Books or Boobs?" he put up a photo of a woman with massive breasts, cupping them to hold them up and added underneath: "I wasn't thinking of Sheyla Hershey, who has the world's largest breasts, when I wrote the headline, but a picture of her boobs is more interesting than one of O'Reilly the boob." He calls Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich "goofballs like Rick Sanitarium and Speaker Newt Moonbeam."

When writing about Jesse Ventura's Conspiracy Theory TV show, he says "I think Jesse Ventura is performing a major public service. Whether the power plant in Alaska is really a Tesla death ray machine or there were bombs used at the World Trade Center on 9/11 are grist for Ventura's imagination."

He seems to fit in just fine with Robin's paranoid little cabal.

For the record, we did not post his comments because they were not actually comments. They were private messages to the writers at Mocking Robin. we knew he would take a few quotes and use them out of context but that's OK. That's what Robin and her followers do. We stand by what we have written on this blog since we started it. Robin is an angry, bitter person who does not understand that she was not forced out of her republican chair position by a conspiracy. She was forced out by her own incompetence. The same people who voted her in made her resign. You can either say they were right both times or they were wrong both times. To say they were right when they gave her what she wanted and wrong when they took it away from her is just proof of how self centered Robin really is.

Just because this person writes a biased piece for a small local paper doesn't change the truth.