One of Robin Yess's immature little playmates has started a blog he is calling the Smokeout. Our question is what is this guy smoking? He's apparently either not too bright or he doesn't read the things the leader of his flock of birdbrains is writing on her website. Or both.
Robin accused a former county legislator of running Mocking Robin along with a couple of other blogs. Now her buddy is saying that it is Terry Bernardo behind our site. This is so incredibly comical, like the old black and white silent movies where two guys are trying to go through the same door. I'm sure Robin's pal knows about those movies since he claims to be a former movie maker back in his home country. Too bad nobody ever actually saw any of those movies, at least nobody we know of. Maybe some communist party apparatchiks did in some obscure cabin on the sea. But nobody who actually matters.
Could you guys at least coordinate your fingerpointing so you don't look completely dumb?
Getting back to the point, we must really be getting under the skins of Robin and her tiny cabal. They are desperately trying to figure out who we are. They want so badly for people to believe that we are political leaders because that would allow them to keep telling people that they are victims of some backroom political conspiracy.
Hate to tell you guys, but Mocking Robin is not written by anyone who is or was in the republican party leadership. We are all just everyday folks who have had enough of your kindergarten antics. You can spin it any way you want. We are who we are and it ain't who you think. But keep on accusing people. It's pretty funny.
Have some balls why dont you tell us who you are
ReplyDeleteMy, my, my. Isn't it kind of strange for an anonymous poster to demand that others reveal their identities?
ReplyDeleteThe thing is, there is a long tradition in American history of anonymous political comments. Thomas Paine originally published Common Sense anonymously. We know that the next comment will be, Are you really comparing yourselves to Thomas Paine? No, we aren't. We are just following his example and that's a pretty good example to follow.
We decided to follow that example for one main reason. The message is what's important and that message will get lost in the noise if Robin's rabid attack dogs start doing what they always do, attacking the messenger.
The things we say are true. Most of the things Robin and her allies say are nothing but insults without substance. You can't even say whether something like that is true or false. There are no allegations of facts in those posts. They are just offensive, nasty insults.
Let them keep insulting people but we aren't going to give them something they can use to muddy the water and take away from the facts.
We are anonymous posters saying it's OK to be anonymous. You are an anonymous poster saying it's not OK to be anonymous. Which of us has more credibility?